Jamie Clark Who Lost 3 Fingers In A Cell Door, The IPCC Tell The Force To Fit ‘Finger Guards’ To All Cell Doors

You have seen on a previous post were videos were shown of the horrific injuries caused to Jamie Clark when his fingers were caught in a cell door. You saw half a dozen police officers standing outside the cell doing nothing to help him.

The police watchdog said there was insufficient evidence to bring misconduct case against any officers. The IPCC did call on the force to put finger guards on cell doors.

Please read the link below:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-42309161

After Christmas, I will show you a video where the same police force sprayed pepper spray in Jamie’s face at a train station in a separate incident from the one above.

Finally, PC Ian Naude who was charged with raping a 13-year-old girl appeared at Chester Crown Court on Monday December 4th. The Chester Chronicle were not present at court and published that he pleaded not guilty to one count of rape and two counts of sexual assault, I can confirm Naude pleaded guilty to 2 other sexual related offences and wouldn’t plead to another two; the case was put off for trial until the end of April 2018.

https://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/news/chester-cheshire-news/cheshire-police-officer-pleads-not-13993104

Four Gary’s; you’ve had the first post yesterday on Gary Lloyd, Gary John Jones’ post will be on 25/12/17 at 6 o’clock in the morning and you will have a Creamer Cracker in the afternoon, I’ve not mentioned these two people before. I can confirm there is an investigation ongoing with the council & the police in to Gary Sky, I have asked the question to the authorities should he be suspended from the head of PubSafe until the investigation has been completed, neither will confirm whether he has been suspended or not.

Lynne Plumb bought Gary an electric toothbrush for his 47th birthday on Sunday, he snapped it in half not because he doesn’t have to brush his teeth but because City beat United LOL.

Speak to you all on Christmas Day.

JFT96 – YNWA

A Welsh female Sergeant Guilty of Harassing Her Former Law Tutor Sends a Message “Snog me, Chew me, Come And Do Me”

A South Wales Police Sergeant Melanie Earnest 39, was found guilty at Caerphilly Magistrates Court of harassment. The former police officer bombarded her female law tutor with emails, phone calls and gifts after Melanie became besotted with her tutor.

The ex-police sergeant sent Ceri Hughes flowers on Valentine’s Day with an explicit card reading “snog me, chew me, come and do me”. Ceri Hughes was horrified by this Valentine’s Day card, Melanie was constantly calling Ceri’s home phone and her mobile and wouldn’t take no for an answer.

Melanie told police in her interview the pair had had sex in Miss Hughes’ office and were enjoying a lesbian affair she claims Miss Hughes would lock the door behind them while they romped for 45 minutes but district Judge Andrew Shaw dismissed Melanie’s claims as lies and convicted her of harassment. She was sentenced to a two-year prohibitive activity order, which bans her from any contact with Miss Hughes, she also had to pay £800 costs.

DC Don Kenyon, on the previous post I left my number, I have had no calls from any of you, what’s your opinion on this case with Melanie? The lies just keep coming and coming from these Welsh officers, we can only hope that all these police officers that have been sacked can be replaced by hard-working, honest and decent police officers. DC Kenyon from St Asaph police station was commended by Judge John Rogers in my trial, but over 12 months later when a complaint was made by myself against Kenyon, he doesn’t remember going in the witness box, selective memory comes to mind Mr Kenyon.

Please read the link below

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2057591/Sgt-Melanie-Earnests-snog-chew-note-female-law-tutor-harassed.html

JFT96 – YNWA

Two Welsh Police Officers Buy Under Age Teenager Cider In A Bid To Get Him To Confess To Unsolved Crimes

Detective Constable Geraint Jones and Detective Constable Neville Bradbury who are stationed at Cardiff Bay police station went to visit Sean Wall at Parc Young Offenders Institute in Bridgend; they took him out of prison for the day, drove to the local Spar and bought him cans of cider and got Sean p****d, then took him back to Cardiff Bay police station.

The deal by the two officers was to give Sean the alcohol and then ask him to confess to crimes, Sean confessed to crimes he didn’t commit which looked great on paper for the police’s detection rate, showing it had solved crimes. Sean asked the police officers in the police station could they contact his solicitor, he asked 17 times.

Again what I find astonishing is that the two police officers were investigated by the IPCC and both officers kept their jobs.

So this is a message to any young boys under the age of 18 and you want alcohol for Christmas, phone the local police, ask them to get you a few cans and you just confess to a few crimes you have not committed, it helps clear the books for the police.

Finally, Don Kenyon, Jason Davenport, Nicolas Hawe and now retired Superintendent Simon Humphreys, I would like to know your opinion on this shocking behaviour on what those officers did to that young teenager?

Do you feel guilty for charging me and my wife for mortgage fraud? Bearing in mind it was a victimless crime and no complainant, you may be giggling to yourselves saying we took £350,000 from you Creamer, but I can tell you the public wont be laughing when I show the cost of the trial and the millions of pounds of public money wasted.

Please read the link below

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2087450/Police-plied-Sean-Wall-17-cider-bid-crime-confession.html

JFT96 – YNWA

A Welsh Man Loses Three Fingers In Police Custody, Watch Videos

A father from Burry Port in Llanelli, Jamie Leigh Clark was at home on the evening of 20th of June 2016, Jamie’s neighbours called Llanelli police station and reported a domestic as they could hear two people arguing.

The police attended the home address of Jamie where there was a minor incident of two people arguing, the police became heavy-handed and threatened to taser Jamie, they then arrested Mr Clark for a police assault. As we all know readers of the blog, these are the tactics they use, it’s difficult to prove when four officers say you have assaulted them, it’s your word against theirs and they have now justified their actions for taking you in. Jamie is now in the back of the van on the way to custody on an assault charge.

I am going to show you three videos.

The first one is Jamie entering the custody suite where two officers have Jamie in a headlock and are marching him straight to the cells. There are six police officers accompanying Jamie plus a male and a female officer at the custody desk.  Most people know whenever you are taken into custody you’re supposed to be booked in, your name and details given to the custody officer and the nature of the offence you have been arrested for, for some reason Llanelli police have chosen to ignore this procedure.


Now moving on to the second video, warning this is graphic and disturbing.

Jamie is placed on the cell floor where you can see 6 officers in the cell, Jamie is stripped naked, the handcuffs are eventually removed, all the officers back out of the cell and as the last officer backs out, you can then see Jamie stand-up naked, then he goes to grab the door, you can see the officer slam the door shut on his left hand severing three fingers you can see Jamie banging on the door with his right hand screaming for help and for the police to open the door, how convenient the audio has been switched off on these videos.

You then see later Jamie lying on the floor semiconscious, his right hand trying to stop the bleeding on his left hand, astonishingly it took them three hours to eventually take Jamie to hospital.


These videos are absolutely shocking, the police have a duty of care to look after anyone they have in custody around the country no matter what they had been arrested for.  Llanelli police you have failed and let Jamie Leigh Clark down, come on it is time to pay him compensation now.

Video three shows half a dozen police officers outside M4 cell where they have closed the door on Jamie’s hand, you can see a police officer wiping the blood off his top that has squirted out of the edge of the door from Jamie’s hand also see them looking above the M5 cell at the blood splatter.  The officers seem to think it’s a joke the amount of time it took them to open the cell door and to add insult to injury they charge Jamie with common assault on a police officer.


Jamie eventually attended Llanelli Magistrates Court on 18 October 2016, some four months later Jamie pleaded not guilty and the magistrates found Jamie not guilty of the common assault as they said they were too many inconsistencies in the police statements.

Jamie then put a complaint in as to how he was mistreated at Llanelli police station. As usual the police say they have done nothing wrong and it was referred to the IPCC (I Protect Corrupt Cops), Jan Williams investigated from the IPCC, how strange she said the same basically the police have done nothing wrong. I have told you on previous posts when you make a complaint they love to tire you out and wear you down, this is the protocol you have to go through.

I have had lengthy conversations with Jamie and my heart goes out to him and his family, he’s finding it very painful this time of year having to wear gloves, now the police and the IPCC have finished their investigation, Jamie can now claim against the Chief Constable of Llanelli and his foot-soldiers, I think we would all agree he should be entitled to compensation, I cannot say any more at this stage as Jamie’s claim is imminent as I would not like to prejudice his case.

I would like to wish Jamie good luck and all the best for the future, I know it’s difficult for Jamie, he used to be a painter and decorator and can no longer work and is finding it very difficult at the moment.

Your comments would be appreciated.

JFT96 – YNWA

North Wales Police Officer Guilty Of Stalking A Female Police Officer

A North Wales police officer Stuart Alfred Bradshaw from Flint, admitted stalking his ex-partner between July 2016 and March 2017. Bradshaw couldn’t cope and was desperate when Emma Dinning told him the relationship was over, Emma who was also a police officer made it clear to Bradshaw that she wanted nothing more to do with him. He accessed one of her social media accounts hundreds of times, Bradshaw also sent flowers & posted a photograph of her and her cat on his Facebook account.

The good old district judge Gwyn Jones gave Bradshaw a 12 week prison sentence suspended for a year and placed him on rehabilitation with £85 costs and a £115 surcharge to be paid. He was also made the subject of a 5 year restraining order not to contact his victim Emma Dinning.

This was the same judge that on 21 December 2016 just before Christmas sent myself and my wife to prison both for 33 months; my solicitor John Brown from Liverpool told Gwyn Jones ‘Mr Creamer has already paid £100,000 to the confiscation unit and you will receive another £250,000 at the end of January early February’ and then reminded the judge ‘that you shouldn’t activate the sentence when a person has assets available’.  Good old Gwyn Jones was having none of it and as I said, he activated the sentence four days before Christmas not taking into account we have children and grandchildren.

The same judge that said he knew nothing about our case yet when he sentenced us, he knew chapter and verse, I have mentioned this before on a previous post; karma comes to everybody Gwyn (before Gwyn was appointed a District Judge, he was a solicitor for Gamlins, some of his clients were affected by the Thoughts of Oscar scandal). A serving police officer who has stalked and abused his position of trust receives 12 week prison sentence suspended for 12 months, he is now likely to lose his job John Hanson from Professional Standards Department is going to be very busy with all these naughty little officers drink-driving and stalking.

Please read the link below to the Paedophile Post:

http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/policeman-accessed-exs-social-media-13714930

North Wales Police Finally Admit They Knew Who The Author Of The Troll Blog Thoughts of Oscar Was

Please read my complaint about The Mob to PSD (Professional Standards Department) it is self-explanatory; I’m sorry it’s quite lengthy but this was their reports back, firstly by Superintendent Sian Beck from the local Policing Services at St Asaph and also a pathetic reply back by good old Detective Superintendent John Hanson, who’s now head of Professional Standards, as I’ve said before when you make a complaint to PSD (stop laughing!!) it’s the police investigating the police and if you’re not happy with the decision you then go to the IPCC (I Protect Corrupt Cops) over 70% of the staff from IPCC are ex police officers, this is throughout the country; what a great complaints procedure talk about banging your head against a brick wall.

If you are ever going to bring a claim against any officer this is the protocol you have to follow and they do their best to tire you out, but please don’t give up. It starts out like this, a local Sergeant in your area will record the complaints which will then be passed to PSD, they will gather all the information and take as long as possible and always try to resolve a complaint with a local resolution, then if you’re not happy it then goes to the IPCC, they can then take up to a year before they investigate and 9 times out of 10 they follow PSD’s decision. When all that has finished you then bring a claim against the Chief Constable in your area and take it to the County Court, I will show you in due course when I had to do this and how much money was awarded to us.

John Hanson as I’ve stated on this blog before had a meeting with Chris Walsh and head crown prosecutor Karen Dixon, it is my belief Karen Dixon was not made aware of all the facts by John and Chris. If the police want somebody charged a thorough investigation is carried out providing as much evidence as possible if they do not wish somebody to be charged should a complaint be made information is held back from the CPS. Somebody’s name was released on the Thoughts of Oscar website, this person was threatened to be killed and violence to be used, John and Chris’s advice to the complainant was that if someone makes a threat they don’t always carry it out, could you imagine readers of the blog if the threats were made regarding a police officer, they would babysit outside his property.

I can confirm that what I have mentioned above was true & factual and mentioned in headquarters but what I can’t confirm is did John Hanson pass this information on to Karen Dixon in their meeting?  I’m sure if Karen would have been made aware of this somebody would have been prosecuted from that poison pen blog.

As we know Nigel Roberts a.k.a. ‘7 Bellies’ admitted to being the author, ex- Secretary of State for Wales MP David Jones carries on denying having any involvement but you have seen his deleted tweets on the previous post and North Wales Police couldn’t prosecute themselves but as you can see from the reports they do their best to close your complaints down.

How convenient for The Mob, the IPCC says in their findings “we do not consider any one’s recollection of events would be clear after such a significant length of time i.e. five years, Verberg can’t remember, Kenyon’s memory has faded and Simon Humphreys took retirement as soon as my complaint came in to save his pension but when The Mob investigated myself and Anita for mortgage fraud they went back over 20 years and cross-examined me in the witness box for over 5 days and expected me to remember every detail, every mortgage application I made, where deposits came from etc, tax I had paid stamp duty, capital gains I had paid and right down to how much money I had spent on my credit cards yet they say it’s hard to remember things 5 years ago.

The truth of the matter is they have now been caught out covering each other’s backs and worrying about their pensions.

Finally, all you people that went to Llandudno police station and reported the Thoughts of Oscar blog to Inspector Verberg, he lied to you when he said he didn’t know who the author was; I’ve been telling you for years that he knew full well who it was, The Mob then moved him over to PSD and that’s where he is today. The reports from PSD, Sian Beck, the report from John Hanson and the report from the IPCC is the biggest load of rubbish I’ve ever read but they have to cover their backs to save their pensions, if The Mob had admitted they knew who the author of the blog was they knew this would have prejudiced my trial and the case would have collapsed.

YNWA- JFT96

The Same Judge Dealt With Two Separate Rape Cases

His honour Judge Rhys Rowlands QC dealt with two separate rape cases, the first one was PC Ian James Clarke of North Wales Police who worked at the major crime unit in St Asaph alongside DC Don Kenyon and Inspector Jason Davenport, you would have read about Ian James Clarke on this blog a few posts back, so you’ll already be familiar with the story.

There is something I can’t quite get my head around, His honour Judge Rowlands told PC Clarke of St Peter’s Park, Northorp, Mold “you have been convicted of the most serious offence of rape, not only did you behave in a wholly disgraceful and immoral way that night, but you took advantage of a woman you thought was badly affected by drink, she was not” the judge told him. So this judge knows this case inside out, he has sat and listened throughout Mr Clarke’s trial and after being found guilty he sentenced him to 5 years imprisonment.

I’m going to point out a few facts here, Ian James Clarke was a police officer in a position of trust and married to a police officer; Clarke couldn’t accept being found guilty, he tried to drag his wife down with him, telling people it was an agreed threesome, this is what the coward Clarke was telling people in prison. No statement was given in to say it was an agreed threesome by his wife. Judge Rowlands said the victim in this case had given her evidence with remarkable strength, a victim impact statement was read out to the judge.

Detective Superintendent Joe Williams from North Wales Police Protection of Vulnerable People’s Unit said Ian Clarke has been imprisoned for five years for a very serious offence of rape. To someone who is unsure as to what the police badge means as the profession of policing has evolved over the years, it is a most visible symbol of service that has taken on an almost iconic meaning, from a practical standpoint officers wear the badge as a means to identify who they are and who they work for, the law-enforcement badge is easily recognisable sign of legal authority, the badge symbol means:

To protect and serve…….not to rape women and not of fit people up.

Take a look at the full story from the Paedophile post below:

http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/arrogant-north-wales-cop-who-12750565

Now let’s look at the case against Mark Hall, just a couple of months after the previous case His Honour Judge Rhys Rowlands also had the advantage of hearing Mark Hall’s trial, Mark was also found guilty by a jury, we have to respect the jury’s decision although juries sometimes do get it wrong as I have pointed out on the previous posts. Mark too was sentenced at Mold Crown Court, the same as PC Ian Clarke.

The judge in this case, in his own words when jailing Mark Hall at Mold Crown Court to 6 years imprisonment, the judge said “the case involved Hall clinically taking advantage of the victim”, the definition of clinical in English is

1.) Relating to the observation and treatment of actual patients rather than theoretical or laboratory studies.

2.) Very efficient and without feeling coldly detached nothing was left to chance everything was clinical.

Remember what the Judge told Clarke, “you have been convicted of the most serious offence of rape” yet only gave him five years imprisonment and not forgetting his job being in a position of trust.

Every rape case in Great Britain, the victim gives a victim impact statement, in a very unusual case ie; the Mark Hall case, the victim decided not to give a victim impact statement. I can’t get my head round how the Judge passed a six-year prison sentence, the parole board take these victim impact statements into account before deciding whether a criminal should be released or what, if any restrictions are required.

Am I right to say readers of the blog, that the parole board should release Mr Hall from custody as the ‘victim’ in this case couldn’t be bothered making the statements?

Judge Rowlands says, Hall must register as a sex offender indefinitely and a restraining order was made, when you read this you must be as shocked as I am. We put our trust in law lords to write the law and the judges to apply it correctly and fairly, how dare Mark’s legal team go and see him in the cells after sentencing & convince a man who is dyslexic and doesn’t understand the law, telling him you’ve had a good sentence as you could have got 8 years. Mark being naïve, thought he’d done well. Disgusting.

I think Mark Hall’s family need an urgent meeting and should draw up a petition, get it signed so that the Right Honourable Prime Minister Theresa May could have this case looked at, as this case is flawed and rotten to the core.

Please read below what victim impact statements are:

” Victim statements may include descriptions of physical, emotional, financial, medical and other consequences of a crime. These statements allow the victims of crimes to add their voice to the proceedings in order to impact the judge or board responsible for making decisions about sentencing. Judges may listen to the impact statements in order to figure out how long someone should go to jail. A parole board might take the statements into account before deciding whether a criminal should be released, and what conditions the board should attach to their release. Besides affecting sentencing, according to the website Victims of Crime, victim impact statements are often useful to victims because they can be cathartic. After all, during the trial, the victims usually have a very limited ability to talk at all about their side of the story. Lawyers ask very narrow questions, and the victim’s opinions aren’t taken into account. Having a chance to read their side in open court can often be a crucial part of the psychological process of healing from any type of crime 

A lay person may not understand how important this statement is and once again somebody who was been raped should apply to the criminal injuries board for compensation.

Here’s a few articles out of the paper about evil women crying wolf, it does happen and I know it’s very hard to understand why a lady would do this to a man. Finally, Mark Hall continues to deny this allegation that was made against him, again just spare a thought for him on how he must be feeling in prison having been convicted with this heinous crime.

Once again thank you for the emails and comments, I keep telling you I can’t publish comments with foul language, I know some comments are nothing to do with this post, they are going on about Gary Sky from the Maelgwyn and how many girls he had in the back of his transit, I promise you it’s all going to come out shortly.

JFT96 – YNWA

Justice for Mark Hall: The Victim’s Mother Is Stalking Michael Creamer

The last post I put out there has attracted lots of attention regarding the injustice for Mark Hall, we still need the public’s help, some of that material that is on people’s phones needs to go to the police.

Let me explain something very simple, Mark will not get a retrial on people saying it’s unfair and I feel sorry for Mark; there is plenty of them remarks being passed around, we need fresh evidence and I know it is out there, we just need you people to come forward.

Please don’t feel scared to do the right thing and go to the police or a solicitor.  If you feel it may occur any cost to get your messages retrieved, I will reimburse you the money; don’t worry it’s all legal, the police have registered informants that they pay money to every day for information.

Now moving on to the victim’s mother, her name is Sharon, she came to Conwy on Saturday night for a drink with a few girls from the Junction, may I say firstly in Sharon’s defence, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, it’s a free country and she can go anywhere, but Sharon and her friends were observed using a mobile phone taking at least half a dozen pictures of me. I’m a little unsure as to why she wants pictures of me, so firstly I’m going to put a picture of me below so she can have a good look at me, secondly Sharon I’ve been with the same woman for 30 years and you are just not my type.

Michael Creamer

Thirdly as your friends know, you always go for older men so that counts me out and finally there must be a reason why you’re stalking me.  If you’re working with the police trying to set a honey trap, you will have to get up early in the morning to catch me out.

You will read a bit further on about a honey trap Sharon, The Mob have already tried that once with Lucie Hobson and Sarah Roberts, two drunken girls on Cadnant Park Bridge that were hung out to dry by The Mob.  A little advice I hope you don’t follow in their footsteps Sharon, I tried my best on Saturday not to let you know that I knew you were trying to take pictures of me, I did manage to view some footage from certain people, the faces on some of your friends look awful and they were half cut through the drink.

I managed to get a picture of you as you left the pub, you know what pub you were in. So here is one of your pictures for you to see:

The advice is free, stay away from me, because I have no intention of stalking you.

I do read emails and comments that are sent in to this blog, on the last post headlines: Justice For Mark Hall from Llandudno Junction, today I read the comments from a Michelle Roberts who is answering back on behalf of the victim, comments had come in suggesting the victim was after compensation and Michelle is defending her; Michelle you’re entitled to your opinion, this is your comment “for your information she hasn’t wanted/taken any money hope that answers your question”, thank you for your comments Michele Roberts, now, I am going to try and help you understand why she should take her compensation.

Any female who has been raped and traumatised would be perfectly entitled to compensation from the Criminal Injuries Board and everybody would agree with that.  I was in court and the victim’s sister was there, she heard as well as I did Mark Hall has no previous convictions, only for a motoring offence and the sister will also know that no victim impact statement was handed in. Somebody who’s been raped fully deserves that money, just have a think about it Michelle, no victim impact statement and now doesn’t want any compensation, do you agree it doesn’t make sense.

What do you think of this now Michelle? Colin Stagg was arrested and charged with the murder of Rachel Nickell, Rachel was just 23 when she died on July 15, 1992; she was stabbed 49 times and sexually assaulted on Wimbledon Common, Southwest London in front of her two year-old son Alex. The case against Mr Stagg was thrown out of the Old Bailey two years later but despite his acquittal he claimed the stigma made him unemployable and a natural hate figure for years after.  Remember that word I told you about, honey trap, at the trial the judge lambasted the Met’s honey trap operation in which an undercover detective encouraged Mr Stagg to confess to the killing by instigating an exchange about his violent sexual fantasies.  How evil are the police and desperate for a conviction, you just wouldn’t believe a police woman would stoop so low.

Mr Stagg like Mark Hall never confessed, why would you if you’re not guilty?  It took 16 years before the true killer Robert Napper was finally brought to justice; by now Michelle, Mr Stagg had submitted a compensation claim and he was awarded a record £706,000 in damages, in those days it was like winning the lottery.

The award was decided by Lord Brennan QC, a Government assessor who described the police tactics as reprehensible, after the pay-out Mr Stagg’s legal team said what he really wanted was an apology from the Metropolitan Police.

My final question to you Michelle Roberts, is do you think it’s fair that Colin Stagg claimed for compensation? I think the whole country would agree it was fair just like the victim should put in for compensation.

Your comments are appreciated, please remember no bad language, thank you.

JFT96 – YNWA