The Evidence Kept From The Jury, Hidden By The Prosecution
Just to update you, 5 Mona Road was bought from the Council and the police never introduced this into the conspiracy, I wonder why?? 4 Church Street, was paid for in cash, so no mortgage on that property, so this wasn’t introduced in the conspiracy either.
We are only dealing now with one property in the conspiracy, Penmon, Lon Padog which I bought from Gary Lloyd and his partner Angela for £54,500, where I lived with my wife and 3 children for over 10 years, around about 9 years after moving into the property I redeemed the mortgage, from the sale of my taxi business, a refund from the VAT and some other personal monies.
When the mortgage was redeemed, as you who have mortgages will know, the house still has to be registered in somebody’s name, so for future security I gave Anita the house, it was registered with HM Land Registry in the name of Anita Creamer.
When Anita decided to sell that property for around £300,000 to a Mr D Williams, she took a smaller house in part-ex, that house being 17 Chapel Street, Penmaenmawr in addition to the £300,000, to be honest Anita didn’t want the small house, she just wanted the cash to buy a bigger house, but she eventually agreed to take it, allowing £50,000 for the part-ex.
There was no mortgage on the Chapel Street house, that was given to Anita in the deal, I did do some additional work on the property and to help get my nephew on the property ladder, I asked him did he want to buy the house for around £70,000 as Anita just wanted a quick sale, at £70,000 it was a bargain and Anita made around £20,000 profit on the sale.
My nephew Ian Pattinson purchased the house from Anita with a small mortgage, Ian lived there or rented the house out for some time, not that it’s any business of ours, the reason for me telling you this, I will explain next.
Ian eventually sold the property to a Michael Spencer for around about £115,000, making over £40,000 on the sale, house prices at that time were in the boom period.
Let me make it clear right now, Ian Pattinson had done nothing wrong, just like anybody else that buys and sells houses.
You may remember Pattinson and Spencer were charged with conspiracy to defraud mortgages they both pleaded not guilty and sat next to Anita and myself in the dock.
The next thing I’m going to tell you, absolutely amazes me, just so we are all quite clear, a child in primary school could understand this.
Anita takes a small house in part-ex, sells it to Pattinson, who eventually sells it to Spencer, the police say they conspired together, I could tell you till the day I die, they never, that’s just how the transactions happened, Pattinson and Spencer both had their own separate mortgages on this house, Anita was the only one out of the 3 who never had a mortgage on that property.
I wasn’t included in this conspiracy, only Anita, Pattinson and Spencer were, but like I’ve said before what I cannot get my head around is how did they find Pattinson not guilty, Spencer not guilty and Anita guilty? Either the 3 of them have conspired together and are all guilty or all 3 are not guilty.
Readers of this blog, it’s not a trick question, but tell me what went wrong? Because the jury quite clearly got it wrong. Remember members of the jury, you wrote a note to the judge, which was read out in open court, saying you were confused as to what Mr & Mrs Creamer had done??
Oh I forgot, they needed Anita convicted to get the proceeds of crime.
My final point, when Pattinson sold the house to Spencer, he never told Anita or myself he was selling it, not that it was any of our business, any more than the £40,000 profit he made was, we only knew he made the profit when this case came to court.
Readers of the blog remember when I told you I swore an affidavit? In those statements were quite a few documents, the affidavit was done by a solicitor in Liverpool which cost me approximately £500 and as most of you readers know, an affidavit is a legal document, anything that would have been in there that was untrue, you would run a great risk of going to prison, you would be a fool to put false documents in the affidavit.
The affidavit was eventually sent to the CPS before I got charged, as time moved on I was eventually charged with conspiracy and put before Mold Crown Court.
That very affidavit went in the jury bundle for the jury to see and read.
Now for the real truth and nothing but the truth, why did North Wales Police along with Wyn Lloyd Jones the prosecutor remove documents from the affidavit that they didn’t want the jury to see? Members of the jury, you have never seen those documents before. You can now see them on this blog.
Let me answer my own question and tell you why they didn’t want the jury to see those documents. Because they desperately wanted me to look like a dishonest man and they needed the jury to convict both Anita and myself, they spent millions on this case, Limbert-Davies a Law Lord in my appeal for my proceeds of crime, said the taxi business was a sham, how wrong he was, I will show you some evidence regarding this statement he made later on.
Remember when I told you I sold the taxi business for £20,000, I sold the name Creamers Cars with school contracts, the contracts where I used to transport children to Douglas Rd school and Ysgol Gogarth, all this was done through my accountant, the taxco.net, we received the £20,000 for the sale of the taxi business, the funds were paid via the Alliance & Leicester into my account and blow me down, a week later, the Alliance & Leicester put another £20,000 into my bank account, I made enquiries as to where this over payment had come from and it had indeed come from the Alliance & Leicester, so I’d actually been paid £40,000 and not £20,000, this didn’t affect the person I sold the taxi business to as it was the bank that had mistakenly paid me again. I’m quite sure that a lot of people would have kept that £20,000 as there’s nothing the bank could do, but the only right and proper thing to do was return the funds, which I did, that was in February 2005, please read the letter below that the prosecution removed from my legal affidavit marked exhibit MC3 and another marked exhibit MC1e, a letter from the headmistress of Douglas Rd school to Conwy Council, trying to ensure I got the contract again, as stated members of the jury, it was North Wales Police trying to make me look dishonest, you didn’t get told the real truth.
The witch-hunt continues…
JFT96 – YNWA