Witch-hunt Part 4

Judge John Rogers QC commended Don Kenyon at the end of the trial, for bringing this case to court, I wonder what John Rogers would think now, after listening to Don Kenyon’s pathetic answers after being questioned by Professional Standards regarding my complaint (which is on the blog a few posts back).

Good old honest Don says when interviewed “I don’t remember going in the box and my memory has faded”, selective memory Don!!! You only answer questions to suit yourself.

Anita’s Barrister before the judge passed sentence reminded the judge what the Archbold Law book states, ‘No woman with no previous convictions should go to prison’. Judge John Rogers QC, disregarded this, Anita went to prison despite having 3 children, there being no complainee and owed no money.

I cannot understand this, like many of the Barristers and Solicitors, they all said it was disgusting, sending Anita to prison.

It’s my opinion John Rogers, aswell as being the opinion of many Lawyers involved in the case and family & friends that you got it wrong.

Below is the response back from the CPS after Guto Bebb asked the question under the ‘Freedom of Information Act’, “Why didn’t the 1,500 other people also get prosecuted? And also who brought this case to court?” as there was no complainant.

The CPS reply with a very vague letter.

cps-bebb1 cps-bebb2

I have contacted the Information Unit, CPS today by telephone, had a half hour chat with a gentleman and I explained in English and simple terms “Why didn’t the 1,500 other people also get prosecuted and who brought this case to court?” he has asked me today to email him requesting that information, which I find a bit ridiculous because my MP Guto Bebb has already requested it, but I’ve done as he asked and he said that when he receives the information he’s going to look into it seriously, so I will update you accordingly.

He also asked me to send him a link to this blog and in his letter back you will see the name crossed out as he asked me to do this and for his name not to appear on this blog, I was happy to do this and he said he didn’t have a problem with the letter going on the blog or any future correspondence so long as his name is crossed out.

I await his reply.

Letter from my mother and mother-in-law to Karen Dixon at the CPS, Colwyn Bay and her response back.

letterKD1 letterKD2

KDreply

The witch-hunt continues…

JFT96 – YNWA

12 thoughts on “Witch-hunt Part 4

  1. NORTH WALES POLICE THE TAXPAYERS NEEDS ANSWERS IT’S IN THE PUBLICS INTEREST. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO CHARGE THE 1.500 PEOPLE WHO HAVE MORTGAGES WITH JONES AND POOLE. IF I HAD A MORTGAGE WITH JONES AND POOLE I WOULD SELL UP OR BE VERY WORRIED. WE WANT ANSWERS NORTH WALES POLICE. THE TAXPAYER PAYS 30 POUND EACH AND EVERY MONTH TOWARDS POLICING YOUR CORRUPT FORCE.

  2. I’m ashamed by North Wales Police is it all true what Michael creamer says about them. Obviously its all true im reading this site for the first time and I can’t believe what I’ve read. Who’s to say the police could come after you or me for no reason. I’ve been reading this blog for the last 3 hours and am horrified by the actions of north Wales Police.

  3. Im watching Guto bebb on itv the sharp end. Guto do you have the time to read this truthful blog??? I hope you do. On setember the 9th 2014 you spoke well in the house of commons about the corrupt north Wales Police. Guto you mentioned collusion at the hands of nwp. Well guto collusion corruption and lies are still plentiful, so I do hope you go back to the house and tell David Cameron that the corrup t nwp are still an untrustworthy lot. Remember guto that song by the police come back and finish what you started.

  4. THE CPS ESTABLISHED AS AN INDAPENDANT BODY IN 1986 TO PROSECUTE CRIMINAL CASES, AND WORK CLOSELY WITH THE POLICE AND OTHER INVESTIGATORS TO ADVISE ON LINES OF ENQUIRY AND TO DECIDE APPROPRIATE CHARGES OR OTHER OUTCOMES IN ACCORDANCE WITH CODES OF CROWN PROSECUTORS. COULD YOU KINDLY ENLIGHTEN ME KAREN DIXON, THE DISTRICT CROWN PROSECUTOR AS TO WHY YOU WERE HAPPY WITH THE NORTH WALES POLICE, MAKING THEIR OWN DECISION NOT TO PROSECUTE THE AUTHOR OF THOUGHTS OF OSCAR BLOG?? IS THERE ANY POINT IN HAVING A CPS?? I HAVE READ YOUR LETTR TO MRS CREAMER YOU WERE VERY VAGUE AND DID NOT ANSWER ALL OF THE QUESTIONS SHE PUT TO YOU, WHAT ARE THE CPS TRYING TO HIDE, I WONDER…..??

  5. Mrs Creamer quite rightly pointed out a victimless crime, and the victims in this case are michael and anita, seems the lawyers made a small fortune, and it was the tax payer who footed the bill.

  6. our beautiful country of north wales, with stunning views, mountains and coast, let down by the MOB very little crimes committed around here which is fantastic, but i dont like to see our police force making up crimes because they have not got a lot to do, except to sit opposite deganwy chippy in an arrive alive van, trying to make money out of motorists. good site but shocking behaviour by the authorities, get your act cleaned up

  7. I’ve made this point before retired lawyer, thank you for your comment, when the police want somebndy charged they take that persons birth certificate and life story to the cps and when they don’t want them to be charged, half the file is missing. The cps then turm around and say there is no evidence, prime example simon joel curzon and wyn lloyd jones prosecution barrister in my trial both between them kept information back from judge john rogers qc this is the new evidence submitted to the ccrc as I’ve stated I can’t divulge this yet.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *