North Wales Police Officer Turns Up For Duty Rotten Drunk

A member of The Mob, PC Neil Bebbington, 48 of Buckley, turned up to work at St Asaph HQ rotten drunk; the legal limit to drive is 35mg, Neil’s breath reading was over double that amount and gave a reading of 80mg. What I find quite strange is that they tried to keep it all hush-hush and the ‘paedophile post’ never reported it in their paper.

He was banned at Llandudno magistrates for 18 months and fined £500, how convenient that he got off with it so lightly, being a very small fine. As you all know readers of the blog, just very recently Wayne Rooney was banned, fined and given community work. Why didn’t Neil Bebbington get community work?

Was it the good old magistrates being lenient with him and his profession again? Did the magistrates not think that this man is in a position of trust, could you imagine if he worked with the ARV (armed response vehicle)? It wouldn’t be good a drunken man in charge of firearms or even working on day-to-day duties in HQ, where there is some very sensitive material, a drunken lout in charge of that is very frightening.

On his arrest, he was reported to be aggressive with other officers and argumentative. I find it quite strange that he remains suspended while the matter is investigated by Professional Standards; Detective Superintendent John Hanson will now consider the case as part of their internal disciplinary process.

It’s very simple, he’s been convicted of drink-driving which is a very serious offence then he should be sacked immediately and his pension taken from him. We will have to wait and see what John Hanson’s report has to say.

We could do with NWP traffic officers sitting at the roundabout at St Asaph business Park, breathalysing a lot more of the staff that work there.

Remember this is the same police station where PC James Clarke who raped a woman worked, the same police station where PC Martyn Parmley who was sacked for going on the PNC, worked. The same police station where PC Andy Gill was sacked from the force for going on the police computer not for policing purposes and the same police station, St Asaph, that fitted me and my wife up, stole money from me, as well as the £350,000 they took off us under the proceeds of crime act, the mortgage fraud was a victimless crime.

Remember DC Don Kenyon works here and he said police officers don’t tell lies, Superintendent John Chapman, I want my money that went missing.

This force is the worst in the country, they think they can do what they like; we can only hope that the Prime Minister Theresa May orders an investigation into North Wales Police. They are laughing at the tax payers, because it is you the public that foots the bill and when I show you on the next post how much money they have spent on me, you will be shocked when you see the invoices.

Read the link:  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-41377487:

JFT96-YNWA 

The Same Judge Dealt With Two Separate Rape Cases

His honour Judge Rhys Rowlands QC dealt with two separate rape cases, the first one was PC Ian James Clarke of North Wales Police who worked at the major crime unit in St Asaph alongside DC Don Kenyon and Inspector Jason Davenport, you would have read about Ian James Clarke on this blog a few posts back, so you’ll already be familiar with the story.

There is something I can’t quite get my head around, His honour Judge Rowlands told PC Clarke of St Peter’s Park, Northorp, Mold “you have been convicted of the most serious offence of rape, not only did you behave in a wholly disgraceful and immoral way that night, but you took advantage of a woman you thought was badly affected by drink, she was not” the judge told him. So this judge knows this case inside out, he has sat and listened throughout Mr Clarke’s trial and after being found guilty he sentenced him to 5 years imprisonment.

I’m going to point out a few facts here, Ian James Clarke was a police officer in a position of trust and married to a police officer; Clarke couldn’t accept being found guilty, he tried to drag his wife down with him, telling people it was an agreed threesome, this is what the coward Clarke was telling people in prison. No statement was given in to say it was an agreed threesome by his wife. Judge Rowlands said the victim in this case had given her evidence with remarkable strength, a victim impact statement was read out to the judge.

Detective Superintendent Joe Williams from North Wales Police Protection of Vulnerable People’s Unit said Ian Clarke has been imprisoned for five years for a very serious offence of rape. To someone who is unsure as to what the police badge means as the profession of policing has evolved over the years, it is a most visible symbol of service that has taken on an almost iconic meaning, from a practical standpoint officers wear the badge as a means to identify who they are and who they work for, the law-enforcement badge is easily recognisable sign of legal authority, the badge symbol means:

To protect and serve…….not to rape women and not of fit people up.

Take a look at the full story from the Paedophile post below:

http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/arrogant-north-wales-cop-who-12750565

Now let’s look at the case against Mark Hall, just a couple of months after the previous case His Honour Judge Rhys Rowlands also had the advantage of hearing Mark Hall’s trial, Mark was also found guilty by a jury, we have to respect the jury’s decision although juries sometimes do get it wrong as I have pointed out on the previous posts. Mark too was sentenced at Mold Crown Court, the same as PC Ian Clarke.

The judge in this case, in his own words when jailing Mark Hall at Mold Crown Court to 6 years imprisonment, the judge said “the case involved Hall clinically taking advantage of the victim”, the definition of clinical in English is

1.) Relating to the observation and treatment of actual patients rather than theoretical or laboratory studies.

2.) Very efficient and without feeling coldly detached nothing was left to chance everything was clinical.

Remember what the Judge told Clarke, “you have been convicted of the most serious offence of rape” yet only gave him five years imprisonment and not forgetting his job being in a position of trust.

Every rape case in Great Britain, the victim gives a victim impact statement, in a very unusual case ie; the Mark Hall case, the victim decided not to give a victim impact statement. I can’t get my head round how the Judge passed a six-year prison sentence, the parole board take these victim impact statements into account before deciding whether a criminal should be released or what, if any restrictions are required.

Am I right to say readers of the blog, that the parole board should release Mr Hall from custody as the ‘victim’ in this case couldn’t be bothered making the statements?

Judge Rowlands says, Hall must register as a sex offender indefinitely and a restraining order was made, when you read this you must be as shocked as I am. We put our trust in law lords to write the law and the judges to apply it correctly and fairly, how dare Mark’s legal team go and see him in the cells after sentencing & convince a man who is dyslexic and doesn’t understand the law, telling him you’ve had a good sentence as you could have got 8 years. Mark being naïve, thought he’d done well. Disgusting.

I think Mark Hall’s family need an urgent meeting and should draw up a petition, get it signed so that the Right Honourable Prime Minister Theresa May could have this case looked at, as this case is flawed and rotten to the core.

Please read below what victim impact statements are:

” Victim statements may include descriptions of physical, emotional, financial, medical and other consequences of a crime. These statements allow the victims of crimes to add their voice to the proceedings in order to impact the judge or board responsible for making decisions about sentencing. Judges may listen to the impact statements in order to figure out how long someone should go to jail. A parole board might take the statements into account before deciding whether a criminal should be released, and what conditions the board should attach to their release. Besides affecting sentencing, according to the website Victims of Crime, victim impact statements are often useful to victims because they can be cathartic. After all, during the trial, the victims usually have a very limited ability to talk at all about their side of the story. Lawyers ask very narrow questions, and the victim’s opinions aren’t taken into account. Having a chance to read their side in open court can often be a crucial part of the psychological process of healing from any type of crime 

A lay person may not understand how important this statement is and once again somebody who was been raped should apply to the criminal injuries board for compensation.

Here’s a few articles out of the paper about evil women crying wolf, it does happen and I know it’s very hard to understand why a lady would do this to a man. Finally, Mark Hall continues to deny this allegation that was made against him, again just spare a thought for him on how he must be feeling in prison having been convicted with this heinous crime.

Once again thank you for the emails and comments, I keep telling you I can’t publish comments with foul language, I know some comments are nothing to do with this post, they are going on about Gary Sky from the Maelgwyn and how many girls he had in the back of his transit, I promise you it’s all going to come out shortly.

JFT96 – YNWA

Justice for Mark Hall: The Victim’s Mother Is Stalking Michael Creamer

The last post I put out there has attracted lots of attention regarding the injustice for Mark Hall, we still need the public’s help, some of that material that is on people’s phones needs to go to the police.

Let me explain something very simple, Mark will not get a retrial on people saying it’s unfair and I feel sorry for Mark; there is plenty of them remarks being passed around, we need fresh evidence and I know it is out there, we just need you people to come forward.

Please don’t feel scared to do the right thing and go to the police or a solicitor.  If you feel it may occur any cost to get your messages retrieved, I will reimburse you the money; don’t worry it’s all legal, the police have registered informants that they pay money to every day for information.

Now moving on to the victim’s mother, her name is Sharon, she came to Conwy on Saturday night for a drink with a few girls from the Junction, may I say firstly in Sharon’s defence, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that, it’s a free country and she can go anywhere, but Sharon and her friends were observed using a mobile phone taking at least half a dozen pictures of me. I’m a little unsure as to why she wants pictures of me, so firstly I’m going to put a picture of me below so she can have a good look at me, secondly Sharon I’ve been with the same woman for 30 years and you are just not my type.

Michael Creamer

Thirdly as your friends know, you always go for older men so that counts me out and finally there must be a reason why you’re stalking me.  If you’re working with the police trying to set a honey trap, you will have to get up early in the morning to catch me out.

You will read a bit further on about a honey trap Sharon, The Mob have already tried that once with Lucie Hobson and Sarah Roberts, two drunken girls on Cadnant Park Bridge that were hung out to dry by The Mob.  A little advice I hope you don’t follow in their footsteps Sharon, I tried my best on Saturday not to let you know that I knew you were trying to take pictures of me, I did manage to view some footage from certain people, the faces on some of your friends look awful and they were half cut through the drink.

I managed to get a picture of you as you left the pub, you know what pub you were in. So here is one of your pictures for you to see:

The advice is free, stay away from me, because I have no intention of stalking you.

I do read emails and comments that are sent in to this blog, on the last post headlines: Justice For Mark Hall from Llandudno Junction, today I read the comments from a Michelle Roberts who is answering back on behalf of the victim, comments had come in suggesting the victim was after compensation and Michelle is defending her; Michelle you’re entitled to your opinion, this is your comment “for your information she hasn’t wanted/taken any money hope that answers your question”, thank you for your comments Michele Roberts, now, I am going to try and help you understand why she should take her compensation.

Any female who has been raped and traumatised would be perfectly entitled to compensation from the Criminal Injuries Board and everybody would agree with that.  I was in court and the victim’s sister was there, she heard as well as I did Mark Hall has no previous convictions, only for a motoring offence and the sister will also know that no victim impact statement was handed in. Somebody who’s been raped fully deserves that money, just have a think about it Michelle, no victim impact statement and now doesn’t want any compensation, do you agree it doesn’t make sense.

What do you think of this now Michelle? Colin Stagg was arrested and charged with the murder of Rachel Nickell, Rachel was just 23 when she died on July 15, 1992; she was stabbed 49 times and sexually assaulted on Wimbledon Common, Southwest London in front of her two year-old son Alex. The case against Mr Stagg was thrown out of the Old Bailey two years later but despite his acquittal he claimed the stigma made him unemployable and a natural hate figure for years after.  Remember that word I told you about, honey trap, at the trial the judge lambasted the Met’s honey trap operation in which an undercover detective encouraged Mr Stagg to confess to the killing by instigating an exchange about his violent sexual fantasies.  How evil are the police and desperate for a conviction, you just wouldn’t believe a police woman would stoop so low.

Mr Stagg like Mark Hall never confessed, why would you if you’re not guilty?  It took 16 years before the true killer Robert Napper was finally brought to justice; by now Michelle, Mr Stagg had submitted a compensation claim and he was awarded a record £706,000 in damages, in those days it was like winning the lottery.

The award was decided by Lord Brennan QC, a Government assessor who described the police tactics as reprehensible, after the pay-out Mr Stagg’s legal team said what he really wanted was an apology from the Metropolitan Police.

My final question to you Michelle Roberts, is do you think it’s fair that Colin Stagg claimed for compensation? I think the whole country would agree it was fair just like the victim should put in for compensation.

Your comments are appreciated, please remember no bad language, thank you.

JFT96 – YNWA

Justice For Mark Hall From Llandudno Junction

Readers of this blog if you could just spare your time and read this post, as to how I was shocked and deeply saddened as to how the system failed Mark Hall. This story will come as no surprise to you as it was written about in the Paedophile Post, Mark ran a trial as he denied committing a single charge of rape in the Conwy area last year but a jury at Caernarfon Crown Court unbelievably found him guilty after a 4 day trial on 11th May 2017.

In some rape cases, where male and female would go back to a house or a hotel and end up having sex, the next you hear is that the female has reported the matter to the police claiming she had been raped, basically it’s down to her word against his, the question in a rape case is was it consensual? In most of these cases the male and female have known each other for years or even been married for many years.

People sometimes think that rape is committed by some madman driving around in the vehicle looking for his prey, stopping a female and dragging her into the car and driving into a secluded area then raping her; I think we would all have to agree when these sort of acts are committed, whoever the person is, when caught should be hit with the full force of the law as they pose a serious risk to the public, they should be sent to prison for a very long time and only be considered for release when they have been rehabilitated.

Now moving on to the case of Mark Hall, what has happened to Mark could happen to any man, anywhere. Mark on the night in question had been out drinking with a female, who in this case is the “victim” and for legal reasons cannot be named. The “victim” had been to a funeral with Mark and at the end of the evening agreed to go back to the victim’s mother’s house not to the victim’s own flat where her boyfriend was babysitting her child, you would have to question why the victim wanted to use the mother’s house and not her own place, common sense should prevail.

I know this case inside out and I cannot comment at this stage, I know the local community would like me to go into great detail, I can’t yet, the reason being should Mark find new evidence, he’ll be appealing and I would not want to prejudice his case.

Mark Hall is a lovely kind-hearted man and would help anybody if he could and very sadly at a young age Mark and his sister lost their mother to a terminal illness, Mark’s Nanna brought Mark up, caring for him, now things have changed and Mark cares and looks after his Nanna up until he was incarcerated on May 11th. He appeared at Mold Crown Court on 26th June last month where his honour Judge Rhys Rowlands sentenced him to 6 years imprisonment for the offence which Mark strenuously denies.

Journalists from the Paedophile Post as well as the CPS made big dramas in the court and in the papers saying the victim was in her early 20s and he was 38, trying to convince the jury that there is something wrong about the age gap. Now readers of the blog, I’m going to point out some simple facts that are plain to see, it’s not rocket science, Mark was 38, the victim in her 20s, as you know there is no problem with this as they’re both over 16.

May I remind you the Paedophile Post, about the Lewinsky scandal which is an American political sex scandal that involved a 49-year-old President, Bill Clinton and the 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky. A sexual relationship took place between 1995 and 1996 and came to light in 1998, do you get the point journalists from the Paedophile Post, the age gap means nothing, Bill Clinton,49, Monica Lewinsky,22, Mark Hall, 38 and the “victim” in her 20’s. What’s good for Bill is good for Mark.

I’m a great admirer of Donald Trump 71 years old and has a wife Melina, aged 47, nothing wrong with the age gap and what is even more surprising the victim’s mother had a child when she was approximately 33 to a man who was in his 50s once again no problem with that, do you get the message reporters from the Paedophile Post or is it that you just love printing scandal? See the picture below of Donald Trump and his beautiful wife.

Nothing comes as a surprise to me the way The Mob deal with cases in North Wales, the victim alleges she’s been raped, Mark was arrested and placed on bail for over a year before he’s charged, something is just not quite right here. Mark has always stuck to his guns and denied these allegations. I was at Mark’s hearing when he was sentenced and his honour, Judge Rowlands said ‘That Mark, it’s plain to me both from your evidence at the trial and from your subsequent meeting with your probation officer that you really don’t have any remorse about what you did that night’. Well done Mark for sticking to your guns, why would you show any remorse and admit to something you have not done and have strenuously denied all the way through.

I’m going to tell you what happened, the system failed him. Mark put his trust in the system and turned up at court hoping common sense would prevail and he should’ve been acquitted but like I said, the system failed him. You may say, the jury don’t get it wrong, oh they do, myself and my wife were fitted up by The Mob.

Now let’s have a look at Barry Michael George, born 15th of April 1960 who was wrongly convicted on 2nd July 2001 for the murder of British television presenter Jill Dando. Owing to the immense popularity of the victim, there was exceptional outrage from the public who were impatient for a conviction. In the absence of other suspects, George attracted police attention because many elements in his background seem to point to his guilt, people saying there is a nutter living at the end of the road, he’s always dressed in army clothes, sadly George was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment; his conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal on 15th November 2007. Sadly, he served approximately eight years behind bars and his claims for compensation for wrongful imprisonment were dismissed.

Please readers of the blog, when you get a chance read the Cardiff three and the Lynette White murder case, it’s on this blog under miscarriages of justice. I could go on and on and discuss a lot more but I’m not going to, do you get the point? Juries do get it wrong.

Mark was represented by JW Hughes & Co of Conwy, how convenient that a week before his trial his solicitor tells him we are changing barristers, we’re getting you another one; just spare a thought as to how Mark must’ve felt, charged with a heinous crime and then the solicitor’s put this on his toes, it must’ve been a lot for Mark to take in, Mark does suffer from dyslexia and doesn’t like confrontation so would not challenge this situation.

What I did find very strange, was the “victim” accused Mark of rape and did not turn up for the sentencing and what’s more shocking, she refused to make a victim impact statement and hand it to the CPS, where it would have been read to the judge. If somebody had been raped and I’m sure there’s a lot of ladies reading this, the victim would have been traumatised by the effects of that night, what happened would be impacting on her life and her families too, so would only be too willing to write a victim impact statement so the judge would read how this has affected her, maybe it’s because it didn’t actually happen the way she has said, this is a rape case not theft or a common assault.

I now want to bring it to your attention to let you know where Mark is and how I found him in his darkest hour after Mark was found guilty, he was sent to prison on remand to Altcourse and because of the nature of the offence he is not allowed to mix with other prisoners and he has been placed on a wing, which is called Melling Brown. This wing is full of sex offenders and paedophiles, I can’t go into detail about what some of these inmates have done, their crimes are horrendous and I think we would all have to agree they are no good to society. But Mark is now having to live with these people with no choice and nobody in the prison would want to go near that wing, they are protected by the staff for obvious reasons, they would be attacked and seriously beaten up.

Because of the job I had in prison, I was an orderly and a trusted prisoner and I made the choice to go see Mark, had I believed for one minute that Mark had committed this offence I would not have gone near him, I have a daughter who is this same age as the “victim” and was in the same class in school. Once the staff let me on to that wing I can tell you it wasn’t easy going on there, seeing all those horrible offenders my job was to switch off and not look at them and to get Mark out from his cell and speak to him, which I did and I’ll be honest Mark didn’t know what had hit him; remember this is a lad who has never been to prison in his life and only been to court for a motoring offence and now finds himself in hell. I had many long conversations with Mark over the time I was there and I kept reassuring him ‘Mark you’re going to get through this’ and overtime I saw him find strength although it was very difficult at times.

I thanked the staff for letting me on there to see him, although I was warned more for my own safety ‘don’t tell other prisoners you have been over here’ but I didn’t care as I believed in Mark, so I hope the “victim” is happy now, knowing where he is for something Mark still strenuously denies, he used to tell me ‘I wouldn’t mind being here for something I’ve done but it gets me down knowing I’ve done nothing wrong’. I’ve seen the way he is living at the moment and the way he’s been let down by the system is absolutely disgusting; I can’t imagine how his family must be feeling, I can only advise they have got to stay strong.

A request I would like to make is if there is anybody out there who lives in the Llandudno Junction area and has any information, no matter how small or irrelevant you may think it is connected to this case, take it to a solicitor or the police as you know I have little faith in the police, but your solicitor would advise you to do the same. If there was any new evidence the police would have to log it down, then the rest would be up to your solicitor to approach them. I believe there is evidence that needs retrieving from a phone it makes you think what work the police did whilst Mark was on bail for over a year.

Finally, please nobody send me the “victim’s” name, people in the area already know who she is and I would not publish her name on this site for legal reasons. Llandudno Junction is a very small community, somebody out there knows something. Mark is a popular lad, liked by many and I’m sure Mark would really appreciate a letter or a card from any of his many friends; to receive a letter when you’re in prison means so much, so get writing, below is his prison number and address:

Mark Hall, A0313DZ, HMP Altcourse, Brookfield Drive, Fazakerley, Liverpool, L9 7LH.

Thank You.

If anybody wishes to speak to me please don’t hesitate to call me on 07977928343.

JFT96 – YNWA

Spit The Dog From The Paedophile Post

Below is a picture of Glyn Bellis from the Paedophile Post walking down Mostyn Street, as he’s passing the Heart Foundation shop on Monday 12th of June, time approximately 1.30pm, he was coughing and spluttering like an old man and spitting on the floor. Where are the enforcement officers when you need them?

Glyn Bellis is the man along with Eryl Crump who sits in courts in North Wales, like vultures waiting for their prey, any story will do; they print lies and hardly ever get the facts right, it’s proven in my case on more than three occasions

Mr Bellis and Mr Crump while you’re watching them, I’m watching you, you love putting my picture in your Paedophile Post.

Your comments are welcome.

JFT96 – YNWA